Consultants and clients talk a lot
about target audiences despite the fact we are told today the best brand offers
are created and developed by their consumers – who is targeting who?
Presumably there should be less
targeting more listening, reacting and ideally anticipating. The challenge is
who are we listening and relating to?
It used to be easy, you just had
customers. Now you have to respond to 'audiences'. Any company in the public
arena has a potential mission impossible situation in terms of always
positively relating to all their audiences. By definition, brands are supposed
to form positive ' relationships' with those who 'buy' the product and service.
Investors look to benefit from the organization they have bought shares in just
as 'traditional' customers benefit from the company's products and services
they have purchased. Both want maximum value return on investment- shoppers
want more for less, shareholders want maximum value return on investment. We
are all driven by our personal needs and aspirations. Add to the mix a
company's staff- their 'inner' customers, and we have three potentially
diametrically opposed motivations and interests.
Defining typical customer profiles,
interests and activities can help identify appropriate initiatives, positioning
and concepts but anticipating changes in attitude- what's in and out is an art
(and luck) as any fashion buyer knows.
I get really worried when some
clients still feel a sufficient brief is simply a socio economic group and some
age profiles. Baby boomers, generation x, now y, maybe starting points for
describing some general attitudes and trends, but the danger is relying on easy
convenient briefs which suit the marketer but can miss a key change or
opportunity in aspirations. The 14 year old Japanese schoolgirl was, and maybe
still is, seen as a reliable trend-leader to watch, but I would not bet on
this.
Now branding has become an accepted
discipline for promoting countries, regions and cities, the complexity of
audiences becomes infinitely multiplied. Alignment becomes the buzz word but we
have to be kidding ourselves to feel we can really effectively align even the
key vested interests. Just a simple generic message line can be difficult -
remember 'Cool Britannia ' was a step too far for the conservative half of the
British population. At best, there needs to be a reasonable coordination of
aspirations from commercial business interests, institutions, the politicians
and obviously the most challenging, the residents, visitors and workers that
ultimately define the success or failure of such initiatives.
Branding use to be about simply
'the packaging 'of a company's products and media, but maybe we are returning
to an era, where we must think through a range of highly coordinated
'packaging' strategies to meet key audiences agendas.
Clive Woodger
Comments